Many consider Herbert Spenser to be a foundational figure in sociology; he was a key exponent of Social Darwinism. To dangerously simplify his perspective, Spenser believed society evolved from simple and less complex forms to more efficient and complex forms through adaptation. The example I often use to explain the process is a fish hook.
We are both fishing. You’re using a barbed fishing hook and the point of my hook is smooth. The barbed hook keeps fish from shaking the hook off as easily as a unbarbed hook. So, let’s say that for every 10 fish that bite my hook, I can only pull in six. But, for every 10 fish that bite your hook, you land eight. Your method of fishing is 20% more productive than mine!
I notice this and adopt a barbed hook for fishing. I tell my friends and they start using barbed tipped hooks too. Gradually, everyone abandons barbless hooks. Since everyone is using barbed hooks now, more fish will be caught in less time. There will be more food for the village, providing villagers more time to pursue other needs. Here is the crux: the barbless hook factories shut down! Workers in the factory have to find other work.
Many Spenserian sociologists would say values, norms, organizations, and social institutions evolve in a similar manner. Less efficient ways of doing things are abandoned by society for more effective ways. Thus, society evolves and improves itself. What do you think? Select a discussion point below and post your response:
Topics for discussion:
1) Do you think the evolutionary processes described above actually occur in society?
2) Do you think those processes can be applied to the proposed GM bailout or the mortgage bailouts? Why?
3) Do you think we should bailout failing businesses? Why? Discuss the ramifications of your decision.
4) Can you think of another social issue or problem that Spenser’s perspective might be applied to? Explain your selection.
5) What insights does this afford you about Spenser’s perspective?